How do I get my reputation back?
It appears that the La Crosse Tribune and the Onalaska Holmen Courier-Life, sister papers owned by Lee Enterprises, would rather sell papers that print honest news. We all know that controversy will stimulate sales. Too bad that the editorial staffs of these papers feel it necessary to attack individual persons to accomplish this goal.
Two years ago after I was elected chairman of the town of Onalaska, I was accused of misrepresenting town spending on a campaign flyer. This was investigated by La Crosse County. No charges were ever filed, yet at the time the editorial staffs of the above papers were treating me as though I was guilty. I suspect that if I had broken the law that I would have been charged.
To date, there has never been any published retraction or article in the above papers stating that no charges were filed.
Back to the present. I have been accused of holding an illegal town board meeting. La Crosse County again has been called to investigate. On March 27, I was questioned by an investigator from the county. By coincidence, an editorial was also in the March 27 Tribune stating the meeting looked illegal. If I am charged (which I feel would be a mistake), I am sure the Tribune and its sister publications will waste no time in convicting me. I am equally sure that if it is determined that no law has been violated that the Tribune and its sister papers will be equally silent. How does one go about getting one’s reputation back after being attacked by the local newspapers?
If a person were to check on who has filed the complaints against me, he or she would find that it consists of a group and their followers who were defeated two years ago in the town election. The complaints are politically motivated, and the
The La Crosse Tribune is playing right into their plans. I run for political office because I enjoy working with the public and feel that I have something to offer. I have no ax to grind. What I ask is the La Crosse Tribune and its sister papers treat all people fairly. The printed news is a powerful tool. What is printed has the potential to harm a person’s reputation. Please, make sure what you print is fair and accurate.
Stan Hauser is Onalaska town chairman.


TickTickBoom wrote on Apr 6, 2009 6:37 PM:
Also, that meeting was only illegal in one facet: the agenda did not spell out the action to be taken. The Onalaska meeting was questionable for a lot more reasons and clearly illegal on two counts: lack of notice to the media and appalling lack of specificity on the agenda.
If Kitzmann and Hauser had been the least bit repentant and tried to remedy the situation like the Bangor president did, I bet the DA wouldn't have pressed charges. I don't know about Gruenke, but I view this as a symbolic blow against the tyranny of the Hauser-Kitzmann cabal. "